Yesterday, I had an
unsolicited call from Sheila, one of the receptionists at my doctor’s practice.
“Nothing to worry about,” she said. “You’re on a list the doctor gave me. I
just need to ask whether you are having any problems with your memory?” I was
tempted to reply, “None that I can recall,” but that would have been glib and
callous considering the NHS is doing its best to pick up early-stage dementia.
So, I just said that I had none and thanked her for enquiring. Anyway, I don’t
know where the line is drawn: they say that memory plays tricks on you; that it
is subjective; that you remember only what strikes you at the time as being
important.
I distinctly remember,
for example, being impressed the first time I saw the 1957 film The Forbidden Planet, but when it
reappeared at a local cinema last week and I had the opportunity to re-visit the
experience, I realised that all I remembered were the spectacular (for the
time) special effects. The cheesy romance between the Captain and the only
female on the planet made no impression on me, although this could be explained
by the fact that I was just a boy – assuming I was when I saw it: I can’t
remember. Anyhow, notwithstanding Hollywood’s schmaltzy intervention in the
plot, I marvelled then at the writer’s vision of the future and thought that
the ability to visualise it was akin to clairvoyance. Now, however, I would
attribute it to imagination, alloyed with an understanding of science and a
degree of historical knowledge, all used to extrapolate what the future might
look like.
Last Sunday morning, I
took a recreational walk, not on the hills or heathlands, nor through the
country lanes and muddy, rural tracks, but in the city. I followed a canal,
from its terminus in the centre of Manchester towards the satellite town of
Rochdale. I walked only a few miles, but how stimulating they were – and in more
than a physical sense. They gave me a glimpse of a continuum of social change –
past, present and future. The starting point was an artisanal bakery
overlooking the renovated canal basins, where ducks float among the houseboats
and people stroll with their dogs around a patch of newly-established park. I fortified
myself with one of their big fat croissants and coffee made from locally
roasted beans before setting off. The people who once worked in this former
transport hub lived nearby in slums long-since demolished. When the railways
made the canals redundant, the land around them lost value and was colonised by
light-industrial buildings. But, with business now concentrated in the service
sector and conducted elsewhere, the last cling-ons have been cleared and the
land given over to a master-plan of high-density, high-cost, inner-city housing.
The canals have been restored, cleaned up and re-purposed for leisure.
It doesn’t take long,
however, to walk out of latte land and into a brown-field development of 1990s
houses built for families. Here, the style is traditional but with modern touches
and the canal has been adopted as a valuable feature, its banks grassy and
cherished. Further on, you come to 1980s houses, their backs turned towards the
canal, 19th century-style, and interspersed with remaining
industrial units. Keep going and the houses get older and shabbier. Further
still and they become grand, reflecting the exodus of the Victorian middle
classes from the polluted core of the city. I was reminded of the concentric
rings of a tree trunk, each one capable of storing information about its
heritage, except that these rings are apt to time-travel.
Overall, however, the current trend is clear: people are moving back into the city. I hope the town-planners
– if there are any remaining – will extrapolate wisely and make suitable
provision for all the newcomers, especially in healthcare. I don’t want Sheila
to be too busy to phone me again next year.