Spike Milligan once mimed a sketch in which, standing straight with his arms at his side, he rotated on the spot while chewing. When he stopped, he said, “Post Office Tower Restaurant,” and this is what sprang to mind when I heard that London’s landmark telecoms tower is being sold to an American hotel chain.
This reminiscence
turned out to be the first link in another kind of chain, that of nostalgic
memories. The sixties washed over me and, before long, I was asking Alexa to play
Catch the Wind,
by Donovan. It was a big hit in 1965, the year the PO Tower was declared
functioning by the Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, though I didn’t consciously
connect the two at the time. It was to be another six years before I came into
the actual presence of the Tower. And though I never went inside, I became
familiar with it because I lived and worked in its shadow for a few years –
which explains my subconscious refusal to accept the subsequent change of name
to the BT Tower. On reflection, however, its original name was patently
ridiculous: all the other post offices in the country were housed in
conventional buildings that were open for business to the public. This one
charged an admission fee, didn’t sell stamps and had a revolving restaurant at
the top that was accessible to only the well-off. The reason I didn’t question
the name at the time, was that I had been brought up in the era of the General
Post Office, an official body that controlled all forms of communication and
was a direct descendant of the original Royal Mail – so called because it was answerable
to the monarchy for the purposes of surveillance and censorship. The Tower, therefore,
symbolised established authority and its continuance into the future, as
embodied in its modernist architecture.
However, when
the delivery of post and the provision of telecoms became separate enterprises,
adjustments were made to both business models, the disposal of redundant buildings
being the most visible. The microwave dishes for which the Tower was built were
discarded long ago, but this building is much more than a left-over mast and
deserves a better fate than demolition. The same can be said of thousands of
similarly empty buildings all over the country, one such being the Palace
Theatre, a half mile from where I live. This seriously ornate entertainment facility
was built around 1898, in the heyday of variety shows but, like so many of its
kind, it has outlived its commercial viability. Even its last incarnation as a
nightclub came to an end and it now stands waiting for either salvation or
oblivion. In the absence of a viable plan of my own, I wait in hope that someone
with deep pockets will come to the rescue. My preferred saviour would be the
Wetherspoons pub chain, not simply because it would bring cheap beer and warm interiors
to a local population that has had more than its fair share of hard times, but
also because it has a commendable record of rescuing and restoring so many
other historic buildings in towns and cities nationwide.
Meanwhile,
back in the capital, where buildings of any description have more commercial
value, competition is fierce for the acquisition and re-purposing of obsolete
property. For example, the old War Office in Whitehall has recently become The
OWO, home to Raffles, London. The name chosen raises the question of whether
the new owners of the Tower will similarly honour the history of the building
by incorporating it into the branding of their new hotel. Might they, for
instance, call it the GPO Pillar? If I were to be consulted (which is
unlikely), my suggestion would be The Spike, with Milligan’s Revolving Restaurant, its crowning glory.