Many years ago I went to visit a friend who was
serving time in a military prison. He gave me instructions on how to smuggle
money in to him: roll up a ten-pound note and insert it into a tube full of
toothpaste. I was a bit nervous about being caught but, not wanting to be a
wimp, I agreed to do it. When the ruse succeeded I was relieved - and a little
proud of my newly acquired criminal nous.
More recently I went to visit another detained
friend although, this time, no test of my loyalty was required because he is in
a very different type of prison - a privately built and operated facility for
young offenders. It is a much less intimidating place where the restrictions on
inmates’ freedom appear to be less onerous. Naively I attributed this to a modern
and enlightened approach to punishment but have since learned that it has more
to do with there being a variety of prison styles tailored to suit different
types of offender.
From my friend’s perspective, of course, the
difference is one of degree only since he will be spending about three years
there locked away from his life. In one respect he has been lucky: there are
prisons with harsher regimes to which he might have been committed, especially
as he is not a young offender. He is, in fact, a family man in his forties and
was sent there because at the time of his sentencing there was a shortage of
prison places. Despite this one stroke of luck, however, he is a misfit because
of his age and the cultural difference it entails. Still, at least he is easily
distinguished from the others in the visiting room: he is the one not
wearing Nike or Adidas.
Despite the comparative humanity of the prison
regime, visits cannot be undertaken on a whim: they require permissions,
forward planning, documentation and, unless you live nearby, travelling time.
The on-site security procedure is as stringent as that at airports but with
additional searches to detect smuggled drugs - despite which, drug use inside is
rife. I have no idea how they get past the searches and the sniffer dogs but I
doubt whether the old toothpaste trick is still in use.
Once past the no-fun security procedure, the
experience of visiting was quite lively. In the actual visit-hall, a large,
airy room with a tea and refreshment bar in one corner and a play-pen for children
in another, the atmosphere was mostly convivial. We were seated at allocated tables which are spaced
just out of earshot one from another but, when my eye strayed, I could not
avoid speculating about the other groups. The prisoners stand out because of
their orange tabards; their girlfriends are easy to identify by their
meticulous grooming and the lustful body language of their imprisoned lovers;
but identifying who is mother, father, sibling or friend afforded plenty of
opportunities for conjecture.
My friend said he had learned to make the best
of his situation by filling the time with every activity and every
personal-improvement course on offer. He is also acquiring some nifty new jokes
and a good line in black, prison humour. He seemed generally optimistic and
cheerful throughout but, when time was up and he had to make his way to the
exit, I thought I detected a little slumping of his shoulders. I counted my
good fortune as I left through the visitors’ door but my relief was tainted
with guilt and regret at having to leave him behind.
Prisons were originally used for temporary
detention prior to the fulfilment of sentence - execution, flogging, banishment
etc. - but they have since become the sentence itself. I am not the first to
question whether imprisonment is an appropriate or effective resolution to
anti-social or criminal activity but I am sure that, in this case at least, the
outcome can only be harmful to my friend, his family and, by extension, to
society.
Don't suppose it was HM Prison Forest Bank? The site of Agecroft Power Station I once photographed in 1983.
ReplyDeletebest wishes John
No - closer to home - Altcourse!
ReplyDelete