If a culturally inclusive
society is what we should be working towards, then a small step was taken this
week when friends invited me to their son’s Bar Mitzvah. I was both pleased and
encouraged by the invitation: pleased to be included in their family
celebration and encouraged at the prospect of progress towards cross-cultural
understanding - our best hope of resolving persistent social conflicts. Plus, I
was intrigued to compare their religious ceremonial with that of my own,
Catholic upbringing.
In the event I noted some
similarities: the use of an ancient foreign language, reference to revered
texts from antiquity, glistening paraphernalia stashed behind velvet curtains
and, of course, an unquestioned belief that God is looking on. The differences
I observed (leaving aside any theological issues) were cultural rather than
symbolic: the ceremony had an informal, friendly aura and seemed relatively
unstructured. Being used to solemn, joyless Catholic services with their emphasis
on obedience to the hierarchical structure, I was anticipating that someone
would step forward and take charge of the proceedings. But it didn’t happen and
I was won over in the end by the relaxed acceptance of individual expression
that prevailed throughout.
There was, however, a lengthy
prelude of worship and prayer during which I was faced with the dilemma of how
to appear interested whilst not actually understanding anything (being an
outsider is never a comfortable experience, no matter how welcoming the hosts).
So, whilst cultivating what I hoped might be a suitably reverent facial
expression and looking around for anything which could occupy my otherwise
blank mind, I became obsessed with the prayer-shawls which the men of the
congregation were wearing. They are of ancient design and not really fit for
purpose since they slip from their shoulders every few seconds and have to be
continually hoisted, flicked or flung back into place in a distracting bustle of
activity. Before long I had drawn a mental blueprint of an improved version
which incorporates some shape and structure to hold it in place. During the
mingling at the end of the ceremony I had to restrain myself from enthusing
about my new design for fear of alienating the traditionalists.
But, for the atheist observer
amongst the Godly at worship, there is more to ponder than paraphernalia. When
the two great social bindings, faith and culture, are so completely alloyed
that one does not exist without the other, how does one group tolerate the
other’s point of view? Bar Mitzvah for Jews, like Confirmation for Catholics,
represents dedication to a religious format which dictates certain cultural
mores. Isolating the two is problematic, as shown by the recent legal rulings
concerning an individual’s right to put religious beliefs before public duties
and the ensuing backlash against what has been called “aggressive secularism”.
And the current argument about same-sex marriage that rumbles among the clergy
of the Church of England, predicated as it is on a belief that marriages are
sanctioned by God, will never be resolved until God’s will can be agreed upon.
I have been invited into
churches, mosques and synagogues, appealed to by Jehovah’s Witnesses and
preached at by proselytisers in the street. I would like to be optimistic about
social integration but history demonstrates that it is usually a temporary accommodation
which lasts only as long as suits whichever party holds sway: hence my concern
that the door of the Schul was locked and attended by a security man.
No comments:
Post a Comment