Despite Lou
Reed having just died, it was a perfect day: the sky was blue, the air was
fresh and crisp and I was catching a train to the ancient city of Lancaster to
meet an old friend with whom I share not only some personal history but also an
interest in things historical.
Waiting for
a train I had time for coffee in a cafe that has a view of the station entrance
- perfect for people-watching. But, as it turned out, the day was to be more
about people-listening, beginning in the cafe where two young men were in
conference. One of them, with his volume control jammed on max, spoke in a strangulated, monotonous drone. The other spoke (whenever he could) so quietly as to be almost
inaudible. They were experts on the management of soil erosion, water tables
and capillary fringes - a worthy and interesting subject, though here badly
presented: the effect was like listening to one end of a phone call.
In the train
carriage most people were solo and silently engaged in reading or social
networking but there was one loud voice talking on the phone - a man in late
middle-age with a rich, deep voice, slightly ragged from smoking but soothing
to the ear. His accent was Lancashire, which was appropriate to his subject - a
guide to rail destinations in the North West of England. It might have made for
interesting listening but for the fact that it came with much repetition and that
his evaluations of places were limited to either “nice” or “boring” - a sort of
Trip Advisor for the undiscerning.
But at
Lancaster Castle we were lucky to have a tour-guide who was blessed with a
pleasing tone of voice, a carefully modulated volume control, sensitivity to his
audience, a sense of humour - and fascinating subject matter: proof that
information can be packaged and communicated agreeably.
Lancaster
Castle has always been the embodiment of aristocratic power and de facto
oppression of the people. From as early as 1196 until as recently as 2011 it
has housed, among other institutions, a prison - and this continuity provides a
reminder that English law is founded on nothing more than the protection of
property. Of the 200 executions carried out at Lancaster, only 43 were for the
crime of murder: the remainder were for theft of various kinds. The original
holding cells - still intact – are dark, airless holes in the wall which served
merely as accommodation for prisoners awaiting either hanging or transportation.
Later, when
custodial sentences were introduced, habitable cells had to be provided to
ensure the prisoners did not actually die in captivity. Consequently, in 1815,
a new prison block was built along the lines of Bentham's panopticon design. It
was still in use when the place closed in 2011. The Castle is a part of the
Duchy of Lancaster, an estate owned by the Monarch for the purpose of
generating an income, but now that it is no longer rented to the Home Office as
a prison, HM’s advisors are canvassing for new ways to squeeze rent out of the
property.
After the tour we took our lunch in a pub on Lancaster's now defunct dock-side (the river silted up long ago). The landlady was welcoming - perhaps because there were so few other customers - and we dined well on moules marinieres and burgers. But, as the beer went down, our discussions became a little heated and naturally attracted an audience. When, after a while, the landlady came over to ask whether we were scheduled to speak in the debate to be held at the nearby museum that evening, we got the message. Perhaps our own voices are not always as mellifluous and modulated as we imagine.
Panopticon?
ReplyDeleteA panopticon is a type of institutional building conceived by the philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham.
ReplyDelete