The precarious
situation of the waged classes was highlighted in 1811 when the Luddites resisted
the usurpation of their jobs by new-fangled machines. Since that time,
employees have had mixed fortunes: some have managed to hang on to the coat
tails of capitalism; others have found refuge in the relative stability of the
professions; yet more have hunkered down in the bunkers of bureaucracy.
Nevertheless the general trend is plain to see: the robots are coming and, as
technology becomes more sophisticated, there will be fewer jobs for humans to
do.
This effect,
already well advanced in manufacturing industries, is now laying waste to the
lower levels of clerical positions as more of us use online processes to
complete our tax returns, book our flights or pay our bills. And the hot news
is that it may soon be the turn of the teaching profession to feel the pinch,
as several experiments involving the deployment of computers have demonstrated.
In India the
pioneering work of Professor Sugata Mitra has shown that illiterate,
non-English speaking children, given access for the first time to a computer terminal,
quickly learn to find and navigate the internet. Furthermore, when set specific
tasks, they make significant, measurable educational progress without the aid
of teachers. In Ethiopia researchers have successfully brought knowledge (which
is one definition of education) to remote villages where there are no schools
by giving ipads to the kids. And in Kenya it's Kindles that are bringing
reading to the masses. These results suggest that human intervention in the
form of teachers may no longer be necessary. Some - Pink Floyd included - would
even argue that the whole system of education is the establishment’s instrument
of mass control and repression: in which case the demise of teachers should
lead to a beneficial surge of individual development and creativity around the
world.
The big tech
companies are surely dedicated to the elimination of humans from their
processes: they prefer algorithms. Facebook has a clever one which monitors
your activity so as to work out your consumer preferences. It has another one
which decides which of your “friends” it thinks you would like to hear from (by
comparing your “likes”) and then ensures that those with different views will
no longer irritate you by appearing on your newsfeed. Google is at it as well.
A nifty piece of published research has proven that it delivers tailored search
results to different individuals, despite their entering identical search terms
under controlled parameters. In other words there is no such thing as a
standard Google search: its algorithms will reinforce your prejudices and, in
so doing, mimic the restricting activities of conventional education systems.
Sometimes
algorithms may appear helpful – even beneficial – as when the likes of Kobo,
Sony, Amazon et al. suggest books and records similar to those previously
purchased - even if they don’t always get it right. I used to think that
Tesco's algorithm was particularly prescient when it came to extrapolating my
grocery preferences, until I realised that any fool, given enough time shopping
in my company, could do as well. What Tesco really needs to work on is the programme
that offers replacement items for those which are out of stock. My last
delivery came with an aubergine shamelessly presented in place of a celeriac
which, if deliberate, was tantamount to a provocative, mind-expanding
experience, which is an uncharacteristic and dangerously subversive precedent
for any algorithm.
The Luddites
couldn't see it coming, but future employment prospects are only promising if
you are a qualified algorithm writer - in which case you could have a job for
life in the business of second-guessing human behaviour.
Oh dear me no! What`s the algorithm for Hamlet or the Hallelujah Chorus; how about Kant`s Categorical Imperative or e=mc2: where do the Sagrada Familia, Guernica or the Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy come in?
ReplyDeleteAbove all, what algorithm will do you Life of Brian or, indeed The Bible?
Algorithms are great for the two dimensions of chess (the rook & King ending) but they are the workhorses of life. They`ll never fly. Unless you can show otherwise.....
Whoa!
ReplyDelete