On Tuesday we
took the train to Chester for a rendezvous with old friends. The weather was so
warm that we were able to enjoy a picnic in the park and a boat-ride on the
river: springtime has most definitely arrived and what a joy it is to see it
again! Each season brings its unique parcel of pleasures - winter frost, summer
green, autumn gold - but spring brings something more exciting: rejuvenation,
the reassuring re-boot of life's cycle.
Chester itself
struck me as having something cyclical about it. The architectural remains of
the former Roman city are revealed in places, though they serve mostly as
foundations for the medieval city which, in turn, support the Tudor and
Victorian buildings. Roman Chester boasted an amphitheatre which seated 7,000
and a public bath-house which incorporated under-floor heating. These things fell
into disuse when the Romans decided to leave which, to my mind, is puzzling. Was
there no enterprising native (or immigrant) ready and willing to exploit the
commercial opportunities of circuses and bath-houses? What were they thinking?
"Good, now they've gone we don't have to go to the circus and be made to
feel guilty about not bathing"? Today, Chester has a theatre which seats
126.
Back in
central Manchester, where there are no green spaces, the manifestations of
spring are not exactly in-your-face. In the courtyard of our apartment block some
of us have placed potted plants - despite the architects' determination to make
no such provision - and a couple of bird-feeders, so that we occasionally get
some real tweets. The neighbouring City Art Gallery, however, has embraced the
idea on a grander scale: its front terrace has been transformed into a garden
with flagstones pulled up, topsoil laid, plants introduced and deck-chairs
placed (tastefully) overlooking the tram line. The theme is 'lost garden' as in
old-fashioned, informal and unkempt. They've cheated a bit by playing recorded
birdsong in the portico, but this may be a temporary measure until the real birds
can be persuaded that the garden is not just one of those arty trompe-l'oeil wheezes. In any case the
people are flocking there.
The plants
continue into the atrium and up the grand staircase where they finally accede
to the regular exhibitions and to a large, temporary show called Eastern Exchanges. This show displays traditional
East Asian artefacts, Western pieces which imitated them and contemporary
pieces which draw on the ancient traditions and techniques which they embody. Like
the garden, it raises the question of what differentiates craft from art. An
obvious answer could be that, while they share elements of creativity, imagination
and skill, craft relates to utility while art does not.
But some
craft pieces are so meticulously wrought that they present a conundrum. Ever
since the machine age it has been possible to make objects beautifully,
accurately and cheaply: continuing to make exquisite, hand-crafted objects seems
to be a pointless exercise. The answer to this lies beyond logic. Crafted
objects are more than the sum of their parts. Their makers have mastered ways
of exploiting the variable qualities of materials to enhance the beauty of
their object in ways that machines cannot; and they have an eye for combining form,
colour and texture that machines don't possess. Machines may make beautiful,
flawless products, but the absence of flaw in beauty is itself a flaw.
Oriental
belief systems like Buddhism and Confucianism originally influenced the design
of the Eastern objects and encouraged the patient, painstaking mindset of the
makers: the rich ruling classes provided patronage in order to maintain
traditions and buttress the status quo. These things have changed but the
essence of craftsmanship has not. It keeps regenerating itself out of the knowledge
and skills of the past, imbuing objects with more than just practicality. Craft,
at its most sublime, is a celebration of creativity for the sake of it: and it
puts a spring in your step.
No comments:
Post a Comment