It was while taking a
break from snorkelling over the Great Barrier Reef that I learned of Trump’s
triumph. The Americans sitting next to me on the boat were pretty chuffed about
it: I shrank from pointing out to them that one of Trump’s pledges was to cut
funding for climate-change research, thereby multiplying the chances of the
demise of the very phenomenon of Nature that they had travelled all this way to
enjoy. No matter: American taxes will be diverted to space research instead, so
future generations of tourists may have other planets to exploit and degrade.
We’ve been in Australia
visiting friends and relatives. It’s been 15 years since our last visit and
almost 40 since my first but I still get a sense of a place that is a pastiche
of America – the vast territory accommodating generous plots of land per house,
the big skies urging people out of doors – and of Britain, as evidenced in the tangible
traditions and trappings of governance persisting from colonial times. No doubt
much has changed since then – my expertise does not run to a proper analysis –
but wherever we went our chaperones would to say “Of course, it’s all changed
since you were last here”. Some of this would be down to recent influxes of
migrants who have brought with them different customs and practices but, more
prosaically, there are cumulative pressures on the cities which face the global
trend of population concentration. And in dealing with this, Australians have a
particular crisis of sustainability to resolve. Much of the housing stock is low-rise
and widely-spaced in a suburban idyll which lacks adequate public transport
infrastructure. The resulting reliance on cars is disturbing: in the households
we encountered it was common for each adult to own a car and to drive it to the
nearest shop.
And the architecture of
the houses themselves is environmentally unfriendly. Traditionally, in very hot
climates, houses were built to take advantage of whatever naturally cooling
properties could be exploited. In Egypt and in parts of southern Italy, for
example, houses would have thick walls and high-domed interiors with vents to
allow cooling breezes: in colonial Australia they were built of wood, raised
from the ground, surrounded by overhanging verandas and, ideally, situated so
as to take advantage of natural shade and prevailing winds. But nowadays all of
this is ignored in favour of universal modern building techniques and the
panacea of air-conditioning. In the face of 30 degrees Centigrade I appreciate
air-con as much as the next person: but what does it ultimately cost us in
degrees of climate change?
Then there is the other
kind of climate that is changing: the geo-political one. The shifts brought
about by the economic rise of Asia and China now loom large over Australian
politics. Its alignment with the economies of the West can no longer be taken
for granted and, especially now that Trump proposes to abandon free-trade
negotiations with Australasia, Australia will be obliged to take its business
elsewhere.
Perhaps this is all too
much for the “Grey Nomads” – the baby boomers who have taken to their mobile
homes so as to follow the fair weather around their vast continent and take advantage
of the zero costs of clothing, heating and keeping-up-with-the-Joneses. They
may just be able to see out their time in the remnants of the old Australian
dream while the young generations forge a new one.
But what of the
dispossessed aboriginal people? I have never spoken to one, though I saw groups
of them sitting under trees in Perth, performing for tourists in Sydney and
wandering disengaged, like ghosts, through the streets of Cairns. Perhaps they
are just biding their time until, after the climate-change apocalypse, they can
once more take custody of the land and nurture it back to health.
Don't suppose you'll be getting a job with the Australian Tourist Office then?
ReplyDelete