The girl in the coffee
shop asks, when you place your order for cappuccino, whether you would like
chocolate sprinkled on top. You reply “no” but you get it anyway. “Oh it
doesn’t matter,” you say, meekly, and creep away to suck it up. It’s not her
fault: she’s just a young girl from Eastern Europe, doing her best to earn a
living, exploited, probably, by the mega-rich coffee company paying minimum
wages while charging excessively for her services. She’s under pressure to
sweat the assets, work the system. You’re inclined to be sympathetic, forgiving
of small human failings, given the circumstances. Nevertheless, when those unwanted
sprinkles appear too frequently you may start to feel annoyed: you may even become
indignant, decide to take action, protest that it’s not what you ordered and,
if you’re feeling really self-righteous, accuse the girl of not paying attention
to what you said. The likely outcome is that you wait in line while she makes
you another coffee, the company loses its profit and the girl feels either
chastened or not. In any case there is no guarantee that it won’t happen again
and your annoyance amounts to no more than a waste of your emotional energy.
You may choose, on the
other hand, not to be annoyed, but to adopt a fatalistic attitude – or to sidestep
confrontation by taking your custom elsewhere (good luck with that). Whenever I
find my tolerance tested, as is increasingly the case now that its youthful elasticity
is challenged by age-related rigidity, I try to remember that I can choose not
to be annoyed. It’s not easy and it requires practice: if you want or expect
things to go according to your personal preference you will soon learn that life
is full of obstacles. Life, if you let it, will annoy the hell out of you. But it
doesn’t have to be that way.
I was thinking this as
I walked past yet another beggar sitting on the pavement. Begging in the
streets is a relatively recent phenomenon in English cities. Its causes are
various – drug addiction, the break-up of families and communities, the
inadequacy of our social services safety-net etc. – but despite my knowing this
I harbour a suspicion (based on hearsay) that some people choose to beg because
it pays well, which is one reason why I prefer to give money indirectly, i.e. to
charities that provide facilities for the homeless. Explaining my policy to each
and every supplicant is impractical (although I did so on one occasion when my
refusal to give prompted a sneering protest) hence I get annoyed at having to
step over so many characters who sit on the street smoking, drinking, petting
their dogs and demanding a share of my loose change (who carries loose change in
this cashless economy?) and the slumped, inert characters who, too zonked even to
ask for money, rely on it being tossed into their awkwardly positioned
receptacles.
There are beggars who
offer something in return – a joke, a tune or a smile. I particularly liked the
approach of one Irishman who asked me for a couple of quid so that he could get
drunk. “I promise not to waste it on food or shelter,” he said with admirable
candour. He got his couple of quid but I wish now that I had taken him to the
pub instead; I might have got a few more laughs. And there was another chap who
cut straight to the chase by asking whether I had a spare room and a job to
offer him.
So when I feel annoyed
by beggars I remind myself that they are a symptom of our dysfunctional
society and I channel my emotional energy into a more useful force-field –
anger: anger, that is, at society’s failure to absorb them.
Trump and Brexit are having a big effect.
ReplyDelete