I had arranged to stay in
London for a while, to catch up with friends and relatives that I don’t see as
often as I would like. As the train passed Watford, there was the customary
announcement over the speakers of the imminent closure of the on-board shop.
Unlike many of the announcements, this one is not spoken by a pre-recorded
voice, which means that there is scope for some unscripted, human communication
– entertainment even – which on this occasion was delivered by a man in
laid-back Jamaican style. It went like this:
“Ladies and gentlemen,
the shop will be closing in (pause) about, er, (pause) ten minutes. No, (pause)
er, about five minutes (pause) or something like that. (pause) Anyway, I’m
closing soon, so if you want any drinks or anything, you better be quick.” It
came across as a laconic, mocking rejection of the corporate robo-speak of the Virgin
Trains manufactured persona. I only wish that all those passengers insulated by
earphones, listening to their own pre-recorded material, could have heard and appreciated
that unique human moment in an otherwise predictably mechanical two-hour
journey. Perhaps it would have made them smile too.
The time in London was
packed, as intended, with socialising but I did find chinks in the schedule to
indulge myself in some solitary pursuits: when people surround you, a little time
to yourself is precious, to be savoured or made use of, not frittered away like
an interval in the drama that is your life. It could be a restorative walk
along the riverside, seeking out a coffee-bar to sit in and read the paper,
perhaps with a fresh, flaky croissant, returning to the social whirl stimulated
and ready to relish the company of others. One day I went to the Geffrye
Museum of the Home
where a succession of period room-sets illustrates the progressing fashions in
British domestic interiors since the Middle Ages. Afterwards I concluded that I
have missed my time and that I should have been most at home in a modernist
bachelor apartment circa 1932. There I would have sat in a deep, streamlined
armchair, puffing on a pipe while reading the paper and listening to a huge
wooden wireless set; although I suppose that, after half an hour or so, I would
have picked up the Bakelite telephone and sought the company of friends.
Another day I spent an
hour (or was it two?) at the National Portrait Gallery, driven by curiosity to
see how Howard Hodgkin – whose paintings appear to be
entirely abstract – rendered his portraits of friends and acquaintances without
resorting to the figurative method. (I was also curious to see whether my
proposal to fix mirrors to the wall in the restaurant had yet been implemented
– but that’s another story.) All I knew
about Hodgkin’s paintings was that they are gorgeously colourful and
intriguingly abstract. Was this exhibition of his portraits, Absent Friends, some sort of artistic
hoax? A re-run of The Emperor’s New
Clothes? However, the labelling and interpretive information provided by
the curator explained that the artist sought to “evoke a human presence” rather
than depict a physical likeness and, once I understood this, I had my
explanation as to why the work intrigued me. (I had long ago been seduced by
the colours.)
Hodgkin, apparently,
worked his memories of his subjects and the places they inhabited into those
portraits, thereby immortalising his experience. Most of us make do with
reminiscing from time to time – perhaps at occasional gatherings, maybe after a
few drinks – and when we die, so do our memories. Nevertheless, the experience
sharpened my purpose and I returned to my social calendar determined to continue
celebrating those who have influenced me over the years and building my store
of memories, even if I shan’t be handing them on to posterity.
No comments:
Post a Comment