It was a gruesome start
to the day. I had checked my phone for new messages and found attached to the
first one an unappealing photo of a friend’s sore foot. The next, from my
sister, was worse: a photo of a gory wound on her leg. I really should take
heed of the latest advice – to limit screen time – at least until after
breakfast. However, I recovered my equanimity and, the weather forecast being fine,
set off for a walk. (Lately we have had daily variations in our weather: cold
and bright; cold and overcast; or cold and wet. I prefer the first but don’t
mind the other types because I have a strategy for making the best of them:
indoor activities.)
This fine day, I took a
walk around the northern fringe of the city centre, dodging the homeless people
on the pavements, to check progress on the housing developments that might, one
day, give them shelter. The good news is that there are plenty of units being
built. Less good, however, is the prospect that they will not be cheap.
Moreover, in the inevitable compromise between density and quality, density
appears to have gained the upper hand. In the euphemistically named
neighbourhood of Angel Meadows, for example, identikit blocks of flats crowd
each other out as they loom over narrow Victorian streets. And, despite our
acquired wisdom of the social value of creating inter-active neighbourhoods,
there seems to be no provision for communal facilities or open spaces. But my
walk was not completely soured by disappointment: further along, in the quarter
called New Islington, the buildings are more varied and set to make the most of
the old canal basins and the small but thoughtfully created park. There is hope.
Turning to indoor
activities – apart from an excellent lunch hosted by a friend, which drifted
boozily into the early evening – good chunks of my time were spent at the
cinema. I went to see Nick Parks’ Early
Man, despite it being a ‘family entertainment,’ because it is set “near
Manchester, around lunchtime” in the Pleistocene era. Sure enough, there were
actual children in the audience, though I doubt they got the metaphor about
sustainable economic growth that the storyline conveyed (a primitive tribe is
ousted from its habitat by the forces of profiteering capitalism). Actually,
toward the end of the film, in spite of the gripping football match, small
children started to wander the aisles in search of something more interesting,
while adults sat rapt.
Again, despite
misgivings, I then went to see The Post.
I am reluctant to pay money to encourage Stephen Spielberg because, although
his films are undeniably well made, they are invariably tainted with his
trademark insertion of at least one unnecessary and extremely schmaltzy scene.
However, the cinema beckoned, offering shelter from the elements, and the story
of The Post – the fight for the
freedom of the press – is a noble one and, worryingly, of recurring topicality.
Everything was as expected – the film was well made, the actors were terrific
and the schmaltzy scene came in on cue – but there was one thing about the
story I had not previously realised: that the owner of the newspaper and, as
such, the person who defied the President’s injunction, was a woman. In the
light of this and other facts, it seems to me that now is a particularly good
time to celebrate her principled stance.
100 years after women
fought for and gained suffrage, 50 years since women at Ford’s Dagenham plant
made a stand for equal pay, and amidst current revelations that gender pay
inequality remains rife (lent force by the high-profile publicity afforded it
by the BBC cases) it appears that there is a convergence of forces, like some rare
astronomical event. Perhaps last night’s Blue Moon was an auspicious omen for
gender equality; it’s a pity the sky was overcast and we all stayed indoors.
No comments:
Post a Comment