It is not easy to “love
thy neighbour”, especially when it’s not reciprocated, but I suppose that is
the point of this Christian exhortation. Anyway, one tries. It is not necessary
to subscribe to Christianity to realise the logic of getting along with the
neighbours. ‘Live and let live’ is the secular equivalent recipe for peace and
harmony. (I have always thought that “love” is not quite the right word to use, by the way.
Love seems too intimate and intrusive a concept to be appropriate to
neighbourly interactions. I daresay it is possible for love to occur, though its
romantic implications could lead to complications. It is far more likely – and,
perhaps, advisable – that relations are established on friendly, cordial or
respectful grounds.)
This week, I attended the
funeral of the father of an old friend, a man I had liked and respected. The
sadness and sense of loss was mitigated, as it often is, by the social aspect
of the event: the coming together to grieve for the departed, salute their
achievements and face up, together and publicly, to the inevitability of life’s
cycle. In this respect, the funeral was – for me, at least - an apposite and
satisfying event. There was, however, one fly in the ointment: an aggressive
vicar. The main service was held, appropriately, in the parish church which, to
an atheist guest like me, is a bit of a challenge. But I am used to being
invited to ceremonies in churches, synagogues and mosques (once) and have found
a way to overcome my aversion. I focus on the idea that the main event is not
the worship of a god, but the celebration of the human condition, facilitated
by the institutions of religion. As one rabbi put it, “we worry more about the
purity of dogma than about the integrity of love”. I am, therefore, always glad
to be invited and hopeful that there is an understanding that active participation
in the religious rites is neither expected nor required of outsiders.
Which brings me to the
aggressive vicar. In previous experiences of christenings, bar mitzvahs,
weddings, funerals et cetera, I have followed the crowd and stood, sat, bowed
my head or knelt as and when required. I have never felt uncomfortable refraining
from praying or singing. After all, I usually don’t know the form and, when I do,
only from residual (and fallible) memory. I gave up on the belief a long time
ago. This time, however, I had the feeling that the vicar disapproved of my
restraint. I was convinced that he was willing me to open my mouth and sing
along to the hymns – even though I was not the only one mute. Perhaps I was
being paranoid and the other refrainers got the same treatment. He might have
been scanning the room for unbelievers, determined to make them feel that the
wrath of his god would punish us for refusing to see the light and truth. Whether
this was my imagining or not, he most certainly had a heavy-handed way of proselytising
his god-fearing agenda, so much so that I felt he was co-opting the spirit of
the ceremony to promote his religious agenda.
The vicar was at the door
as we filed out of the church, shaking hands with everyone who passed, while
keeping an eye on the collections going into the plate. There was no way to avoid
shaking his hand as I passed. To do so would have caused offence where none was
intended and so I brazened it out, looking him in the eye and thanking him, in
a love-thy-neighbour gesture, for the service. I swear he glared at me in
return.
No comments:
Post a Comment