The UN Climate Change Conference (COP
25) in Madrid seems to rumble on – as conferences do – without the sense of
emergency upon which Greta Thunberg, George Monbiot, Extinction Rebellion and
others are insistent. “Glacially slow” is the description applied to the progress
being made though, given the current rate of temperature rise, the metaphor will
soon be out of date. Governments are inclined to do business as usual, until
they feel obliged to adopt minimal measures to address environmental concerns –
despite the scientific certainty that such minimal measures ensure that we are set
on a course for doom and destruction. Still, it should be no surprise that people
are prepared to ignore, deny or rebuff the facts, since this peculiarly
illogical human trait is one that that populist politicians have always
appreciated and exploited. It is, as has been said, “difficult to get a man to
understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it”. So, if
it is desirable to motivate people to save themselves from destruction, other means
must be employed. One of those might be to encourage empathy.
Ever since stories have been told –
orally, written or acted out in plays and films – they have afforded us the
opportunity to put ourselves in others’ shoes. Such a shift in perspective enables
us, without being persuaded by argument, to see and feel beyond our own tight circle
of preoccupations and to perceive a common humanity in spite of differing
circumstances. I was at the cinema this
week and I saw a couple of films that did that trick for me. So Long, My Son
brought a few tears to my eyes, even though the setting is far from my own life
and experiences. A Chinese couple whose only son drowns before reaching teenage,
suffer the torments of bereavement and loss – as parents will. The fact that China’s
official “one child” policy was promoted as a solution to its economic dilemma
is well known, but its sometimes tragic personal consequences are not so
apparent seen from overseas. What a skilfully told story such as this can do is
make you feel the consequences, not just nod your head in comprehension.
The other film I saw that offered a similar
insight is Blue Story, a tell-it-like-it-is portrayal of what it is like
to be a black youth caught up in the warfare between South London’s “postcode
gangs”. This was never my experience, any more than was life in communist
China, but the film engaged both my brain and my sympathies – something that news
media struggle to achieve with even the best, unbiased reportage of news, statistics
and related commentary. The difference that distinguishes them is the dramatised
story’s ability to make an audience engage with the characters as real people
and, consequently, identify with their human dilemmas.
Even though we might accept the fact
that ecological disaster looms, it does so – conveniently for many of us –
either somewhere else or sometime in the future, which makes it relatively easy
to ignore. David Attenborough, with his nature-under-threat films, has done a good
job of rousing people’s passions for the subject, but the visceral effect of observing
the sufferings of other species does not necessarily transfer through to our
own. To motivate us to save ourselves from destruction, we need more
exposure to personalised, dramatised stories of climate-change crisis and
ecological disaster that make us feel the pain. These stories may exist
in parts of the world that have already been affected, in which case, let them
be translated and set before us, since all the factual presentations thus far have
not been enough to provoke us to significant action.
No comments:
Post a Comment