They were pretty good at recycling in olden times. When I went to Old Sarum last week, I was awed by the hilltop site, but disappointed by how little was left of the medieval castle and cathedral – just the rough, stony outlines of the excavated foundations were visible. All the good stuff had been taken away and used to build nearby Salisbury, the new town that grew to replace the ancient settlement. Fair enough, I suppose. Dressed stone was an expensive commodity and, besides, people back then weren’t to know that gawpers like me would come along centuries later, in our leisure time (in itself, an unimaginable concept), to try to extrapolate what their lives were like.
Archaeologists
trace continuous occupation of the site from 400 BC to around 1300 AD, so it
has a layered history. Of those layers, the one that was on my mind that day (because
I am halfway through Kazuo Ishiguru’s the Buried Giant) was the time of
the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms. However, it was the subsequent legacy of the Norman conquest
that had the dominant and lasting impact on modern society and, as I gazed down
on Salisbury, some of the links came into focus.
Ever since
the Normans took all the land and left the populace to make a living, either in
service to their conquerors or by foraging on licensed ‘commons’, we have been
stuck with the same system, although it has become so normalised that we tend
to forget its origins. It only got worse for the population at large: the
commons were subsequently ‘enclosed’ (privatised, in today’s parlance) and
people got accustomed to wage slavery as an alternative means of subsistence. It’s
not a stretch to describe the present day oligarchs and their political
enablers as the modern equivalent of the Normans, an elite that seeks to own
everything and rent back to the rest of us that from which profit can be
extracted, including hard-won ‘commons’ such as education and healthcare.
Contemplating
history from the heights of Old Sarum put me in a grumpy mood, but not for long.
All things considered, I’d rather be a peasant in 2025 than in 1025: at least I
have the benefit of some education and a degree of mobility, which means I can
visit other historical sites, such as the town of Southport, established around
the 1820s and now well past its heyday. I have been several times, accompanying
my Other Half, who has business there. While she works, I wander and observe
what has become of the place.
It was once a
prosperous and fashionable resort, offering hydrotherapy treatments and seaside
frolics at fancy hotels. Its wealthiest scion funded a gallery and museum, the
Atkinson, that is now run by the council and where I go to obtain background
info on all the down-at-heel, grandiose buildings. While I was there last week,
I saw a display about what is, as far as I’m aware, the only product of the
town, potted shrimps, a delicacy to which I am partial. My appetite for lunch
duly whetted, I went off in search of a retailer.
But retail
in this and many other towns is not what it used to be. There are too many shop
premises – some shuttered because of the internet, some because of the presence
of M&S and the like. If the town centre could be ‘tidied up’ by
consolidating all the shops in one area instead of sprawling over the three
that have developed over time, it would look a lot neater, even moderately
prosperous. It would also make it easier to discover that nowhere in the town
is there a shop that sells potted shrimps. I could have saved myself the
trouble by googling. They are, of course, available online and might even have
been delivered to me by a gig-economy worker on a bike, a form of subsistence employment
not dissimilar to that which peasants endured in medieval Britain and,
therefore, one in which I will endeavour not be complicit.