We were
having lunch with old friends in a city-centre restaurant when 50,000 people
marched past the window waving banners and chanting slogans. It wasn't
unexpected: the marchers were left-wing people taking the opportunity to make
their views known to the right-wing people who were staging their annual party
conference here. If the right wing's choice of venue - this city which has
always been a bastion of The Left - was an attempt to convince us of their
credentials in respect of inclusive democracy, it missed the mark: they may comprise
the majority of our coalition government but their agenda is widely regarded as
being elitist. Their stated "policies" are transparently cynical
ploys to capture votes so as to strengthen their grip on power: which is,
unfortunately, par for the course with the party political system.
Later, while
sweating out my lunch-time indulgence with 30 minutes on the cross-trainer, I
convinced myself that the proprietors of the gym ought to devise a way to
harness my energy by wiring the machine to an electricity-generating turbine.
That way they could help save the planet - or at least refund part of my
membership fee as a Kwh credit. But, to be realistic, that would be beyond the
remit of a business which exists not to benefit humanity generally but to make
profit for its shareholders specifically. Which is, unfortunately, par for the
course with the capitalist system.
It is an
endemic problem: that factions, interest groups and cliques seek to run things
for their own benefit, often at the expense of others. On a small scale things
can be made to work fairly: the family business, the parish council, the
cricket club and so on may be persuaded - or prevailed upon - to get along with
their neighbours. But when we scale the entities up the stakes get higher and neighbourliness
disappears in a mist of greed-fuelled rivalry.
Two recent
events illustrate the argument. On Monday Silvio Berlusconi, a convicted
tax-fraudster and megalomaniac, attempted to bring down the government of Italy,
not in order to rid his beloved nation of an evil, repressive government, but
simply in order to further his personal, political aims. And the next day the
Federal Government of the USA was shut down by a Republican faction that refuses
to accept legislation that will allow 20 million fellow Americans access to
health insurance. Such attempts by political interest groups to wield power,
regardless of the cost to society as a whole, should alert us to the fact that
the current system of democratically elected national government is in need of
revision.
When I first heard of the concept "global village" I was enthused with idealistic dreams of international understanding and co-operation, free interchange of people, goods and ideas and the end of war. It seems I was too hopeful. What we actually have is a "global market", control of which is the ultimate goal of trans-national corporate entities. The efforts of national governments to regulate this process are increasingly ineffectual. Given this, and the fact that the pursuit of factional interests renders national governments unfit even for the purpose of representing the interests of their populations as a whole, it is surely time to revise the role of national government.
Great piece, but sadly I feel that city-dwellers are just as self-serving as anyone else, after all we all know neighbours who put their interests before others around them, so why would they care about the wider implications of their actions?
ReplyDeleteJo, well considered piece. Sadly local self Governance will involve folk, who after a time will evolve to have self interest or obsessions, that eventually denies clear decision making.
ReplyDeleteJo
ReplyDeleteNot sure myelf, sadly. Agreed that most political(and military etc) decisions are posturing to gain/keep power and promote vested interests. So many colluded in disastrous murderous military interventions and continue to do so.
I'd give you a try at being our benevolent dictator, but I suspect there'd be trouble.