The other
evening I attended a talk on 'masterplanning' organised by the Manchester
Modernist Society (that's Modernist as in architecture). It provoked in me
feelings of both admiration and disappointment; admiration at the vision of the
master-planners and disappointment at the mangled outcome of their ideas. The grand
designs they proposed for post-war development of the university campus and its
integration into the surrounding community, presented in colourful drawings and
meticulous cardboard models, had been retrieved from the archives and were
presented on a giant screen. I marvelled at their ambition.
Hopeful
vision was not in short supply during the post-war rebuilding of Britain but
those were difficult times: the economy and the built environment both had been
severely damaged. Furthermore, the inner-city site earmarked for this
particular development was already populated by a mix of buildings - academic,
industrial and residential - some new, some old and some derelict. I can see why
piecemeal progress was inevitable under such circumstances. In the event, one
masterplan succeeded another until individual vision became diluted. And all
the while building designs were compromised by budget cuts and planning
restrictions. Today, with masterplanning in mind, a walk through the campus
becomes an archaeological exploration in search of those elements of the
plan(s) which were realised. I lament the unfulfilled utopian visions of the
planners and am disappointed by the compromised outcome.
But disappointment
is a hazard we face daily - and here's one I should have seen coming: a film
called Fury. I had been seduced by
the trailer into believing this might be an exciting tale of WWII derring-do
but the reality was just an updated version of the same old Hollywood clichés.
The next day I fared better with the British film Pride, based on the true story of a group of lesbians and gays who,
despite having their own struggles with the establishment, formed themselves
into a group to raise money to support the miners during the epic strike of
1984-5. Pride is as British in its
conceit as Fury is American - and the
cost of its production must have been about the same as the budget for
refreshments on the set of Fury. But
the one thing the two films do have in common is their single-word titles,
neither of which I find either intriguing or sufficiently descriptive of the respective
stories. And whilst Fury might be a
more appealing title than Brad Pitt Wins
the War Single-Handed and Helmetless, it is less honest than, say, Tanks Ahoy! As for Pride,
I would have preferred the esoteric LGSM
(Lesbian & Gays Support the Miners).
But the week
has not been all about cinemas and lecture theatres: there have been pressing
concerns, one of which was the need to do something about my over-grown
sansevieria (a houseplant better known by the more descriptive vernacular,
'mother-in-law's tongue', because of its sharp-edged leaves). This, and the
fact that the broadband dongle which I managed to get working - despite Vodafone's
best efforts to deflect my phone calls - has now ceased to work, may be reasons why I didn't sleep well on
Tuesday night. It's well known that
anxieties - however minor - become magnified during the troubled hours of
sleeplessness. But which came first: anxiety or sleeplessness? And why is it
that sleep, a function so essential to our well-being, can be so elusive at
times?
The following
morning everything fell back into perspective: a trip to a garden centre (is
there no better word to describe a place than 'centre'?) resolved the
sansevieria issue; and as for Vodafone, I resolved to approach the task of
calling in a calm but doggedly determined manner (after I had taken a nap). So
far this has produced no result but I remain philosophical: life is apparently oblivious
to masterplans.
No comments:
Post a Comment