Last Tuesday
evening was the 50th anniversary of Bob Dylan’s concert at the Free
Trade Hall, Manchester (now a Radisson Hotel). The event is remembered
particularly for the fact that someone in the audience shouted “Judas!” as Bob
came on stage with his electric guitar and supporting rock-band. I wasn’t there
– although I was at one of the London dates on that tour and remember well the
controversy over whether this represented a sell-out from ‘folk’ to ‘pop’.
Mancunians who were there, however, organised
a commemorative concert on Tuesday at which the original play-list was
performed and the audience was encouraged to shout in unison at the precise
Judas moment. This, I presume, was meant to be ironic, although I can’t be sure
because, again, I wasn’t there.
It seems to
me now, after fifty years of listening to music, strange that anyone should
express outrage over musicians choosing to progress from one genre to another
or trying out different instruments, styles and techniques to express
themselves. Genre-purists are misguided if they think there was ever a time
when their preferred musical style had not been influenced by what went before
it. They may, if they wish, keep digging for fools’ gold but their time – and
money – would be better spent on a ticket to see the film Miles Ahead, looking out especially for the line in which Miles
Davis says “jazz is just a made-up word, man”.
The benefits
of cultural cross-fertilisation are difficult to quantify (although one wit
asserts that “a change in perspective is worth 80 IQ points”)* but they certainly
apply to more than just music. In the fields of cultural endeavour, while it is
good to identify and preserve the most refined products of any established
genre, the opportunities to adopt or adapt from elsewhere enhance the
sophistication and complexity of social interaction. Take, for example, the
sandwich: where once the choice was limited to either cheese or ham, white or
brown, now it encompasses pannini, burritos and wraps from around the globe.
And now there is the bao. I have hitherto
walked past the Chinese ‘bakery’ across the road and looked with suspicion at
the goods in the window, none of which resembles a loaf of bread. Then I read a
foodie review which explained the mysteries of the bao, a bun which is steamed, not baked, often with the savoury
contents already implanted. Hey presto! Another version of the sandwich.
Yesterday I
stepped across the road and got myself a bao
for lunch. It was stuffed with spicy pork and was quite delicious. Baos will henceforth be added to my
repertoire of lunch-time choices. Red bean pancakes, however, will not: I had
picked one on a whim because it looked interesting, but appearances can be
deceptive and I found it had the consistency of sticky playdoh and a taste not
worth the effort required to chew it. Note: exotic does not necessarily equate
to desirable.
Actually, I
might have attended the Bob Dylan commemorative concert but for a prior
arrangement with an expeditionary force from the Heaton Moor Jazz Appreciation
Society to a gig featuring the rarely-seen-south-of-the-border Scottish
saxophonist Tommy Smith. In fact, the band was a trio led by Norwegian bassist
and composer Arild Andersen, a musician noted for his progressive approach –
which includes the use of electronic enhancements to his instrument. Given that
most of our members had been attracted initially to the gig by Tommy Smith’s
reputation, they were nevertheless delighted – if surprised – by the first,
triumphal number. Dave said that he had never before heard of such a thing as an
electronically enhanced upright bass. Nevertheless, he showed no sign of
outrage and did not have to be restrained from shouting “Judas!” How time
mellows us.
*Alan Kay, Computer Scientist, b. 1940 -
No comments:
Post a Comment