I had to change at
Sheffield so, as the train approached the station, I closed the novel I was
reading just at the point where one of one of the main characters arrives at –
Sheffield station. I know coincidences are commonplace, but this one was extra-coincidental
for I was on that train by mistake. I had intended to catch the faster train, in
which case I would have arrived at the station long before I encountered Randeep,
the character in the novel. Then I would not have alighted with his description
fresh in my mind of the place as “bright and airy”. Again, coincidentally, I also
found it to be both bright (it was a sunny day) and airy (it is not enclosed
like most big city stations).
Unfortunately for Randeep,
his first impression is soon subsumed by the gritty realities of daily life, especially
as he is there, as an immigrant of questionable status, to try to make money to
send back to his family in India. As it happens, I was also on a family support
mission, though one far less onerous. I was on my way to stay with my sister
and brother-in-law who were in need of logistical support following medical
interventions which had left them both with limited mobility. The extent of my
selflessness is paltry when compared with Randeep’s, yet our circumstances
highlight an everyday dilemma: how much value does one place on personal
freedom when it comes at the expense of familial duty? There is truth in the
adage “No man is an island”, even though some would like to pretend otherwise.
The freedom to please oneself comes and goes, subject to circumstances beyond our
control. Therefore, extended periods of self indulgence might be thought of as
holidays – on an island, say. I have had quite a few such holidays in my
lifetime, but the birds have come home to roost just often enough to remind me
that frailty comes to us all and that family support – if you have it – is the
first line of defence.
This may begin to sound
like I am paying the premium on an insurance policy that is designed to come
good when I am in need of help and, to some extent, this would be true but for
the fact that there are no guarantees of a payout. The relatives you help may
not be inclined to reciprocate – they may even be dead by the time you need to
call on them. In any case, I am keeping up the payments. In the past month
alone, I have been to three family get-togethers, offered assistance to one
elderly aunt and entertained one nephew: not bad for someone with a life-long
aversion to the bosom-of-the-family lifestyle. And, in case my aversion to
family life should be interpreted as nothing but selfishness, I would like to
make a case for my having inherited an independent streak that was subsequently
nurtured and honed by the English boarding school system. Where were mummy and
daddy when I needed them?
So, I am temporarily
living in my sister’s house, immersed in the life of her immediate family and,
while it is a pleasure to be with people I like and love, there are certain
aspects that jar with my ‘independent streak’: having to hold conversations
over breakfast, for example. Of course, I am working hard to accommodate the
alien habits of other peoples’ lifestyles and to find ways to carve out some
personal space within the family routines. In the end, however, I have to take
example from the novel and its characters, all of whom are entwined in the
classic, tightly-knit Indian family structure. There, they have a saying: the
bigger the family, the easier it is to find your own space within it.
What was the novel?
ReplyDelete