This morning, on the radio, I listened to Rupert Lowe, the hectoring leader of the political party, Restore Britain, express his stance on immigration with the frequent assertion that “most people would agree (with me)”. So, to what point in time does he want to ‘restore Britain’ and how does he know that most people concur (with him)?
The latter
point may be dismissed as irrelevant: what he may assert without proof, I may
refute without proof. As to the former, there is a great deal of context to be
considered, which is what I’ve been doing this past week, as it happens. In Devon,
Dorset and Sussex I have enjoyed experiencing traces of British history and the
cultural residue left in its wake.
The 4000-year-old
stone circle at Kingston Russell (Dorset) was the oldest of these but,
unfortunately, I couldn’t quite locate it. After a two-mile walk along a
private farm road and in searing heat, the last stretch lay across fields,
uphill and without signposts. I chose the wrong side of the fence and ended up lost
in a crop of sweetcorn, with no sightline to the stones. I did subsequently identify
an alternative route but, since it entailed passing through a large herd of
cattle, my enthusiasm waned and I trekked back to the campervan, pondering the
while whether Britain in the Late Bronze Age had been a better place, you know,
before the immigrants invaded.
It’s a moot
point, of course, because the Romans, Vikings, Angles and Saxons all turned up
before too long, each wave flooding ‘our’ island with its foreign genes and
funny ways. Then, there were the Normans. By coincidence, I stayed at a
campsite near the Sussex town of Battle, named for its location as the site of
the 1066 defeat of King Harold by William, Duke of Normandy. There is a signpost
to the actual battlefield, though more recent evidence suggests it took place closer
to a roundabout in the centre of town. Whichever, I didn’t visit it anyway, as
I’ve nursed a particular grudge against that last wave of newcomers ever since
I saw the tapestry at Bayeux back in 1982.
That grudge
is reinforced each time I visit a stately home, the seat of such-and-such a
family that has owned it since they built it on land given to them by William
as reward for their support in his conquering endeavour. And when, thereafter,
those families used the social media of the day, portrait paintings, to glorify
their lineage, boost their status and persuade everyone else to consider them a
class apart – aristocracy – they pulled off a great con.
I doubt that
Restore Britain is considering a return to pre-Norman times, as that would
entail a lot of property being returned to the commons. Perhaps they have in
mind a more recent period like, say, the 1980s, when the concept of common
ownership was sufficiently diminished to the point where most of what remained
in our ownership could be taken without much resistance, or “privatised”, to
use the capitalist euphemism for theft.
But heritage
isn’t all about property. Back in Devon, I poked my nose into the week-long
Sidmouth Annual Folk Festival, a celebration of traditional forms of music and
dance created, curated, performed and, to this day, still owned by common
people. I saw youngsters doing clog-dances that originated in the Lancashire
cotton mills of the industrial revolution; Morris dancers performing stories from
medieval England; hurdy-gurdy players teasing tunes out of unwieldy instruments
invented in Europe a thousand years ago; and impromptu bands of assorted
musicians playing jolly, Celtic jigs in packed-out pubs.
Perhaps, in
a few years’ time, we may expect the programme to include more recently integrated
forms of British folk music – African drumming, say, or oud-accompanied middle
eastern love songs, both of which I would pay good money to hear. Whether most
people would agree remains to be seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment